Philippines completes first computerized polls
By Melvin G. Calimag , ZDNet AsiaTuesday, August 12, 2008 08:35 PM
PHILIPPINES--Despite threats of postponement and intermittent skirmishes between rebel and government troops, the country's first computerized election has been conducted smoothly--though only in some parts of the troubled Mindanao region.
The automated polls proceeded with minor problems on Aug. 11, with about 85 percent of 10.5 million registered voters casting their vote, according to election officials. The landmark election was confined within the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM), an aggregation of areas in the southern island populated mostly by Muslim inhabitants.
The Philippine government spent some 600 million pesos (US$13.6 million) in the computerized election, which served as a test-pilot for the country's general elections in 2010.
The Commission on Elections (Comelec) said a few voting machines malfunctioned during the election, but these were promptly fixed by local contractors.
The Comelec used two electronic voting systems for the polls: DRE (direct recording electronic) system for the province of Maguindanao, and OMR (optical mark reader) technology for the provinces of Basilan, Sulu, Tawi-Tawi, Shariff Kabunsuan and Lanao del Sur.
The DRE system allows voters to select on-screen the picture of the candidate they wish to elect. With the OMR technology, voters are required to shade an oval box next to the candidate's name on a paper ballot, which will then be scanned and the vote automatically captured by OMR-enabled machines.
The Comelec, tasked to determine which technology will be used for the 2010 elections, deployed about 3,300 machines in Maguindanao and 156 automated counting machines in the other five provinces.
Elections commissioner Moslemen Macarambon reported that Rajah Buayan, located some 45 kilometers from the provincial capitol, was the first municipality in Maguindanao to transmit its election results.
Asked about the polls in the entire province of Maguindanao, Macarambon said: "[It was] generally smooth [and] orderly because no single report of any untoward incident has reached us."
He estimated the total voter-turnout in the province was at least 85 percent, based on election results transmitted so far, to the counting center.
The election had proceeded amid hostilities--that escalated on election day--between the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) and the country's military forces, in the neighboring province of North Cotabato and a significant part of Maguindanao.
Comelec spokesperson James Jimenez said in a blog post that the ARMM poll was a significant milestone in the country's election reform, noting that voters showed enthusiasm in using automated voting machines amid security problems. "We have seen the long queues of voters eagerly waiting for their turn to vote using the electronic voting machines," Jimenez said.
Vince Dizon, spokesperson for equipment supplier Smartmatic-Sahi, said in a statement that the computer glitches encountered in some precincts should not be considered a major problem since the company's field support technicians were quick to resolve the bugs.
"We had deployed backup machines to serve as contingency in case any of the machines were bogged down," Dizon said.
Smartmatic-Sahi also set up a call center in Manila to serve as technical support hub for its field support technicians, who were deployed in the various voting centers across Maguindanao and canvassing centers in the rest of the provinces within the ARMM.
Local TV reports also featured voters who said the automated voting machines were more convenient and easy to use, compared to the manual voting process. The reports also included interviews with poll precinct officials, particularly teachers, who said the automated systems were easier to use and administer.
A TV news report noted that the main office of the Comelec was able to provide a preliminary tally of votes just a few hours after the precincts closed, compared to the weeks--if not, months--previously required using the manual system.
The Comelec added that the actual printing of official ballots was broadcast live over the Internet a few days before the election was held.
A 22-man foreign delegation from Malaysia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Cambodia and Thailand, also observed the election process.
The Philippine government had attempted to postpone the use of computerized voting in the election, because it was involved in ongoing negotiations with the MILF and wanted the separatist group to participate in the electoral exercise.
However, Comelec commissioner Rene Sarmiento made an impassioned speech to a Congressional committee urging the country to take the opportunity to trial the e-voting system.
"No elections, no lessons in automation, and no equipment to use if and when the elections push through," Sarmiento had said. "The peace formula should be: on with the peace process, on with the electionsÂ… Let us proceed with the elections, and together reap the benefits of automation."
Melvin G. Calimag is a freelance IT writer based in the Philippines.
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
galeng XD
ReplyDeleteI think that the electronic voting system is a godo idea not only to speed up the election process but also to contain widespread cheating. With electronic polls, votes could be counted on real time with perfect accuracy. I believe that COMELEC will just have to make sure that the machines are tamper-proof and would not malfunction on the election dates. Lastly, I also think that this is a good idea because it signifies the country's commitment to go forward technologically.
ReplyDeleteelectronic voting system? i think this is crap! its because its easy to manipulate votes with computer considering that philippines is one of the most corrupt country!
ReplyDeleteit can be done, but not thru the net, the file should still be handled by a moderator. why? because an important information passing thru the net can still be manipulated by hackers. Theres no such thing as a perfectly secure network. Were just living in a corrupt country being lead by corrupt leaders. Why bother if this option makes it easier for them to cheat it. I think its just another crap for officials to corrupt more money.
ReplyDeleteWhy not? We are already behind other Asian countries when it comes to technology, this is one way of coping up.
ReplyDeleteWho wouldn't want a fast process during election period? Less paper works, faster results, and quicker voting. Though there are some glitches, technicians are always present to fix it.
Regarding other peoples concern about the system being manipulated, corruption has been a part of many government all through out the world. There is no perfect system.
The problem with our countrymen is that they tend to complain before a process has yet to be started. Instead of helping our country, we continously pulling it to the slums.
- Jumar Mamaba
Network Engineer, PUP Sta. Mesa
kung magagawa naman nilang user-friendly yung mga machines siguro wala namang magiging problema sa mga tao. lagyan nila ng radio button para parang sumasagot lng ng quiz sa facebook.
ReplyDeletepero sa totoo lang bumoto ka man hindi, electronic man o mano-mano kung yung mga pagpipilian mo naman na iboboto sila-sila pa din edi might as well na manghula ka na lang. wala naman sa systema ng pagboto yan eh. madadaya at madadaya pa din yan. ang dapat palitan satin eh yang mga tumatakbo para sa posisyon. lahat yan may agenda na makasarili, lahat yan walang gagawing matino.
we will still be in the slums even if we implement it or not, so why not try to question it if we see it unfit to be implemented. why set up anti corruption brigades if we ourselves accept the fact that we cant do anything about corruption?
ReplyDeleteits not how fast we cope up with other asian countries its how we do it.
besides if a glitch/hack case occured in the process of creating a backup/retrieving the data no technician could ever bring back the altered/stolen data.
thats why its safer to whisper than to send an email.
-Cisco student. Mapua Institute of technology
huh
ReplyDeleteno comment
ReplyDeletelet's give it a try, after all, are we not wishing for a more prompt and quicker result of the votes that we should cast? Whether we admit it or not, our government has already spent enormous funds for this purpose and if we again backstop in the implentation of the system, we Filipinos losses more. It should be a better alternative that for the meantime, instead of preempting the negative repercussions of the soon to be implented system, we should think positive - that the problems that are every now and then snowballing during election time should now be put to halt.
ReplyDeleteI always have this prejudice for the government and the voting system of the Philippines. I think, whatever aid we may get to make ev`ry election as clean as possible, as long as the corrupt government people are there supervising, no alteration will occur.
ReplyDeleteSo I say it`s just a waste of funds. Why not try putting the effort on the root of the problem instead?
People have to accept the fact that change is inevitable. One way or another we have to face the new things technology brings us. Though not all of these things could improve the manual system. Probably what we Filipinos should do is give it a try. Yes resources would be put to waste if it doesn't work out, but what if it does? What if the improvement of our country lies on this Automated DRE? We all have to welcome these things, but always with caution and never with greed :)
ReplyDeleteI guess we should give things a try. I'm really looking forward to it. :D
ReplyDeletegive it a try. everything's worth a shot. edi kung di magwork back to manual voting.
ReplyDeletethough i doubt maiiwasan pandaraya kung automated ang election. machines can be REPROGRAMMED, right? so pedeng mapalitan padin values. but anyway, pede na kesa matagal na pagbibilang.
it all boils down to this,
ReplyDelete"can technology save us from abominable elections?"
Arguments.
trade guilds that contrived these machines will steal elections, voting will be more complex, the software will always have glitches, prevalent electoral fraud becomes auspicious, and so forth.
yes, there are snags with the technology, for this should be withstood and unraveled.
These implausible complexities overrating the electoral automation, is less harsh than recording financial transactions. consider financial transactions, as it is monitored and done millions of times a day. surely, the number of people with bank accounts outstrip the number of registered voters. voting intricacy is innefectual compared to financial transactions done each year. yet, you dont heed bank errors routinely. and if you do, you make sure that the bank would know about it. it should always be the same with elections and your votes. reckon with your responsibility as a voter.
id est:
With money transactions, every dollar withdrawn or deposited has its own monitor--someone watching to make sure it gets allocated correctly: the money's owner.
~some asian columnist
The money owner is you. take a lead in warding your votes. if they cannot do it, you can make it happen.
Government dysfunction poses considerable distortions and inefficiency, its given. ranting over institutional incapacities wont do you any good. do something about it.
punish the cheats, not election automation, is the solution. ~Verzola
it is a good move by the government to use computerized voting. it may help easing voting procedures. but as always, we still don't know if there is a floss in the system. we all do know that computers are runned by human beings. right?
ReplyDeletei wud say that computerized voting would be d best idea by the government..even though a lot of questions/advantages but still have a consequences.but for me,its tym 4 a change.everything changes and we shud accept the fact that we shud look forward..we r stil among the third world country bcoz we r afraid for change and embrace others culture.we dnt have to question/criticize wat's government decision.all we nid is be aware in every move they make.be aware that in 2010 u wil be a true pinoy.
ReplyDelete